I have noticed lately that just about any problem you have can be solved by way of some sort of electronic communications. You can get rich via webinar, loose weight from a blog, and repair your love life with an online conference with a the company's registered Lothario. You can do even better if you also purchase the e-book.
Or so they say.
It has been the history of each new media that the earliest adapters are the purveyors of porn and magical remedies for all that ails you. The snake oil salesmen. The internet and social media are no different.
What is different is the democratic nature of the internet. An ad for Rolls Royce gets largely the same treatment as the con man selling magic pills. In print media, there are expensive, high status publications in which the cost of entry is enough to keep out at least the most questionable of advertisers. The same thing for television and radio. Not so much with the internet.
The same open qualities of the internet that allow a young musician to post her new songs on You Tube and find an audience and an entrepreneur to find a disperse but loyal customer base, make it ripe territory for other, less desirable uses. I don't think we can, or should, try to prevent these uses. I do think that we need to learn to be smart consumers.
Also, I think it is important for reputable businesses to embrace the possibilities of internet media options. As has happened time and time again, when reputable companies step up and establish a strong presence in a media, the snake oil salesmen tend to get pushed to the side. Which is a better place for them!
A series of observations and thoughts about marketing, public relations, community outreach, communications and life. Since "Everything is Marketing," this blog can cover a wide range of issues and ideas.
Showing posts with label Marketing and Advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marketing and Advertising. Show all posts
Friday, June 21, 2013
Monday, May 20, 2013
Frequency
There is a rule of thumb I use when talking with someone about how long they should run a particular ad or promotion. About the time you absolutely cannot stand looking at your promotion anymore; when it is driving you nuts to look at or listen to the ad/promotion/billboard/poster/website/etc. one more time; when it seems as if every time you turn the page or log onto a site you see the ad...THAT is about the time your target audience is just starting to notice it.
This is, of course, a broad rule of thumb. There are always those customers who are hyper-attuned to your brand who notice ads and posts well before the general public. Because they care.
There are also those who don't give a hoot about your brand or your industry. They could read or view everything you put and not remember it a moment later. Because they don't care.
I think that this same rule of thumb is even more applicable these days. It also now applies to information of all sorts, not just promotional information. Since there are so many sources of information, people who care about a particular subject often know about news related to that subject long before that news makes it in the local paper or on the Yahoo news feed (if it ever does.)
While this makes it easier for someone to solidify their expert status, it also raises a red flag. If you are a interested in local food, for instance, you most likely keep up with what is written about it, current best practices, new or pending legislation, etc. For the local food advocate, monitoring this information across multiple streams of information has never been easier.
The challenge, as an advocate, is to recognize and remember that the general public isn't doing the same. They don't have the same awareness of the topic that you do as someone who cares about the topic and is following it.
The challenge, as a marketer, is to figure out that sweet spot where you are sharing your message frequently enough to reach your target market, but not so frequently that you end up annoying those early adapters of your message.
Years ago, when I was working for a local hospital, I used my wife and daughter as models for an ad I needed to run. It was a print campaign that ran mostly in the local newspaper. Naturally, my whole family was VERY attuned to the ads I ran in the local paper. My wife commented that it seemed like she came across the ad every time she turned the page in the newspaper. I remember at the time the ad was running mentioning her comment to a colleague. Oh, he said, are you running an ad?
If you are an advertiser, or an advocate, don't make the mistake that the general public is as aware of your topic as you are. It is important to remember that in today's "seek it out" environment, those who are passionate about a subject, a product, a company or a cause WILL inform themselves.
Most likely your target audience is more than these passionate few. Most likely most of your audience will need you to repeat yourself a few times.
This is, of course, a broad rule of thumb. There are always those customers who are hyper-attuned to your brand who notice ads and posts well before the general public. Because they care.
There are also those who don't give a hoot about your brand or your industry. They could read or view everything you put and not remember it a moment later. Because they don't care.
I think that this same rule of thumb is even more applicable these days. It also now applies to information of all sorts, not just promotional information. Since there are so many sources of information, people who care about a particular subject often know about news related to that subject long before that news makes it in the local paper or on the Yahoo news feed (if it ever does.)
While this makes it easier for someone to solidify their expert status, it also raises a red flag. If you are a interested in local food, for instance, you most likely keep up with what is written about it, current best practices, new or pending legislation, etc. For the local food advocate, monitoring this information across multiple streams of information has never been easier.
The challenge, as an advocate, is to recognize and remember that the general public isn't doing the same. They don't have the same awareness of the topic that you do as someone who cares about the topic and is following it.
The challenge, as a marketer, is to figure out that sweet spot where you are sharing your message frequently enough to reach your target market, but not so frequently that you end up annoying those early adapters of your message.
Years ago, when I was working for a local hospital, I used my wife and daughter as models for an ad I needed to run. It was a print campaign that ran mostly in the local newspaper. Naturally, my whole family was VERY attuned to the ads I ran in the local paper. My wife commented that it seemed like she came across the ad every time she turned the page in the newspaper. I remember at the time the ad was running mentioning her comment to a colleague. Oh, he said, are you running an ad?
If you are an advertiser, or an advocate, don't make the mistake that the general public is as aware of your topic as you are. It is important to remember that in today's "seek it out" environment, those who are passionate about a subject, a product, a company or a cause WILL inform themselves.
Most likely your target audience is more than these passionate few. Most likely most of your audience will need you to repeat yourself a few times.
Related articles
Monday, April 29, 2013
The Coronation of Content
"They" say that now, in the brave new world of social media, content is king queen royalty all that matters.
My initial response to that saying is when hasn't content been all that matters?
If content is now everything, that must mean there was a time when content meant less...when what was in your messages wasn't as important as it is now.
With some notable exceptions, I must have missed the Vapid Age of Communications.
My initial response to that saying is when hasn't content been all that matters?
If content is now everything, that must mean there was a time when content meant less...when what was in your messages wasn't as important as it is now.
With some notable exceptions, I must have missed the Vapid Age of Communications.
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)